Well, at least the time away didn't ruin Brock Lesnar's
appetite for controversy. This can be a good thing for the Ultimate Fighting
Championship. You can market a despised heavyweight champion as much as a
beloved one.
Lesnar will test that theory more than any other fighter
in UFC history.
He is healthy enough to fight
again, which on the surface is good news for a sport that has been missing some
of its stars and suffering at the gate.
You figure Lesnar's biggest
worry now is not the serious bout of diverticulitis that forced him from the
cage for months and at one point put his fighting career and, according to him,
life in jeopardy but rather the thought he might need help the next time he
visits Canada.
Do you remember the scene in
"Rocky" where Paulie allows the fighter to train in a meat locker? Something
tells me if the Canadians can round up enough willing bodies to actually move
the behemoth Lesnar, his next stop across the border might be hanging out with
all the sides of beef his stomach will no longer allow him to consume in such
large quantities.
"I'm a carnivore," Lesnar
said. "I'm not a big fan of PETA. I'm a member of the NRA, and whatever I kill,
I basically eat."
Wait. It gets so much
better.
Lesnar on Wednesday had a
conference call to announce his return to a heavyweight division that has always
trailed other weight classes in star power and interest, and in the process he
managed to condemn Canada's health care system as one from "a third-world
country," speak against the president's health care reform package and somehow
throw the health care systems of Thailand and Puerto Rico under the bus, which
you know will cause natives there to wonder what in the world they did to be
included.
"I'm a conservative
Republican speaking on behalf of Americans," Lesnar said. "I'm glad to see the
state of Massachusetts has a Republican senator up there now. I love Canada. I
own property there. It has some of the best people and hunting in the world. But
I wasn't at the right medical facility. I had to get out of there. Our health
care system is a little radical but is still the best in the world. I don't want
health care reform. I don't believe in socialism."
The funny part: Lesnar
prefaced his comments by saying he didn't want to get
political.
But this is him. He speaks
about health care reform in the United States from the perspective you'd expect
a wealthy athlete to offer, and he makes broad, sweeping opinions about another
country's entire health care system when he was reportedly seen at a medical
center in a remote northern town of not 6,000 people that serves as an outreach
of Winnipeg.
In a weird, twisted way, this
is part of why he is the sport's biggest draw. He is Notre Dame football to the
mixed martial arts fan. Love him. Hate him. People pay to watch
Lesnar.
You can't discount the power
of an entertaining heavyweight champion, whether you support his beliefs or are
the out-of-work family man hoarding pennies to cover medical insurance premiums
and would like nothing more than for Lesnar's next opponent go all Rocky Balboa
on the champ's face.
Lesnar won the heavyweight
title with a second-round knockout of Frank Mir at UFC 100 in July and promptly
addressed the Mandalay Bay crowd with both middle fingers. The heat began to
rise that evening as to the lengths he could be marketed. Then he fell seriously
ill.
However he healed, from the
time spent at a Canadian hospital that he fled like Usain Bolt from a starting
block, to a facility in North Dakota and then the Mayo Clinic, to losing 40
pounds, to the antibiotics and holistic measures and more disciplined eating
habits he insists saved him from major surgery and wearing a colostomy bag, to
what he and UFC president Dana White were terming a miracle Wednesday, Lesnar is
prepared to fight again.
That will probably happen in
July against the winner or Mir-Shane Carwin, scheduled for March 27 in Newark,
N.J.
"I know one thing," Lesnar
said. "All those guys are (bleeping) their pants right now. Brock Lesnar is
back."
For better or
worse.
There is ample evidence on
both sides.